Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A systematic assessment of large language models’ knowledge of rare diseases: How much do large language models know about rare disease?
1
Zitationen
11
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) perform well on general medical benchmarks, but their ability to reason about rare diseases (RDs) remains unclear. Rather than challenge LLMs to diagnose a limited number of cases that are unlikely to represent all RDs or RD-associated genes, we instead sought to comprehensively probe LLM understanding of RD-associated genes and phenotypes. We systematically evaluated six leading general-domain LLMs (GPT-4, Claude 3.7, Llama-3.3 70B, Gemma-2 27B, Llama-3.2, and Phi-4) for their ability to generate core phenotypic features and causal genes required to support reasoning for 10,892 Orphanet diseases. Outputs were mapped to Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms and HGNC gene symbols and compared with curated references using set overlap, semantic similarity, and disease ranking via the likelihood ratio interpretation of clinical abnormality (LIRICAL) framework applied to 8,000 patient Phenopackets. LLM recall of curated RD knowledge was generally low, with gene associations retrieved more accurately than phenotypes. Commercial models, particularly GPT-4 and Claude, achieved over 60% recall for gene associations but struggled with precise phenotype recovery. Despite low exact overlaps, moderate semantic similarity scores indicated partial alignment with curated data. When used in LIRICAL, LLM-derived phenotypic profiles yielded ranking performance close to that of gold standard profiles, although direct diagnostic accuracy remained limited. Interestingly, convergent non-curated terms across models suggest potential for hypothesis generation. Current generalist LLMs lack the precision to replace curated RD knowledge bases but offer complementary, semantically relevant information. Our results support hybrid approaches that combine expert curation with selectively integrated LLM outputs to enhance and scale ontology-driven RD diagnostics.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology
2015 · 30.943 Zit.
A global reference for human genetic variation
2015 · 19.462 Zit.
The cBio Cancer Genomics Portal: An Open Platform for Exploring Multidimensional Cancer Genomics Data
2012 · 18.075 Zit.
ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data
2010 · 15.260 Zit.
A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations
2010 · 13.443 Zit.