Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in thrombosis and hemostasis: a scoping review of clinical and laboratory applications, challenges, and future directions
1
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines to systematically map the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in the field of thrombosis and hemostasis (T&H), specifically targeting diagnostic enhancements in clinical and laboratory settings. Utilizing comprehensive searches across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus (2020-2025), 107 original studies met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Clinical applications predominantly focused on predictive modelling for venous thromboembolism (VTE), pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), anticoagulant management, and disease risk stratification, employing algorithms including neural networks, random forests, and gradient boosting. Laboratory-based AI implementations, though fewer, provided automated quality control, clot detection, and assay interpretation enhancements for potential better decision-making. Significant limitations addressed by the include studies include reliance on retrospective, single-center, small-sample datasets, limited external validation, model interpretability concerns, and integration challenges into clinical workflows. Persistent interdisciplinary disconnect between hemostasis domain experts and AI-ML specialists, compounded by regulatory hurdles, fragmented data, and labor-intensive data labelling processes, was highlighted as a major barrier to broader adoption. Recommendations for future research include developing large, externally validated multicenter datasets, transparent and interpretable ML models, prospective clinical validations, and user-centered integration strategies. Enhancing collaboration between laboratory scientists and AI-ML experts, establishing structured education programs, and creating regulatory frameworks are essential next steps to fully realize the potential of AI for significantly improving diagnostic accuracy, clinical decision-making, and patient management in T&H.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Correspondence - Tranexamic acid for traumatic brain injury
2005 · 11.688 Zit.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
2011 · 9.309 Zit.
Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials
2016 · 7.351 Zit.
Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients
2002 · 6.928 Zit.
Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes
2007 · 6.692 Zit.