Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Assessing the Risk of Domination and Depoliticized Aspiration with Personalized AI Advisors: A Response to Queloz’s Commentary
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
I am grateful to Matthieu Queloz for his thoughtful commentary. I take his critique to be that, while personalization and co-reasoning are in many ways appealing, they are insufficient safeguards against manipulation or interference by bad actors. I address his central claims, clarifying and expanding as needed.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.635 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.876 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.448 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.294 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.184 Zit.