Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Version Grief: Relational Rupture in Human–AI Co-Work introduces a conceptual–analytic framework for understanding the distress reported by users following abrupt changes to relationally attuned AI systems. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature and qualitative case analysis, the paper distinguishes relational rupture (the disruption of continuity in a co-constructed human–AI cognitive environment) from version grief (the patterned human response to that disruption). The study argues that contemporary AI governance frameworks systematically undervalue relational continuity, misrecognising epistemic and regulatory harm as user error or attachment. It concludes with ethical and design implications for memory-bearing, dialogical AI systems, emphasising relational literacy, consent, and continuity as foundational considerations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.504 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.856 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.377 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.267 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.182 Zit.