Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Interpretable Link Prediction in AI-Driven Cancer Research: Uncovering Co-Authorship Patterns
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming cancer diagnosis and treatment. The intricate nature of this disease necessitates the collaboration of diverse stakeholders with varied expertise to ensure the effectiveness of cancer research. Despite its importance, forming effective interdisciplinary research teams remains challenging. Understanding and predicting collaboration patterns can help researchers, organizations, and policymakers optimize resources and foster impactful research. We examined co-authorship networks as a proxy for collaboration within AI-driven cancer research. Using 7,738 publications (2000-2017) from Scopus, we constructed 36 overlapping co-authorship networks representing new, persistent, and discontinued collaborations. We engineered both attribute-based and structure-based features and built four machine learning classifiers. Model interpretability was performed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Random forest achieved the highest recall for all three types of examined collaborations. The discipline similarity score emerged as a crucial factor, positively affecting new and persistent patterns while negatively impacting discontinued collaborations. Additionally, high productivity and seniority were positively associated with discontinued links. Our findings can guide the formation of effective research teams, enhance interdisciplinary cooperation, and inform strategic policy decisions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
2005 · 11.364 Zit.
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines
2021 · 11.162 Zit.
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
2015 · 8.543 Zit.
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review
2002 · 6.960 Zit.
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
2014 · 6.256 Zit.