Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Integrating Gender-Sensitive Data into Clinical AI Systems: A Proof of Concept for Inclusive Healthcare
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2025
Jahr
Abstract
Current IT tools in the medical system often lack gender-sensitive design, which can compromise both diagnosis and treatment. Since clinical evidence shows that men and women may respond differently to medications, this study developed an AI-based system to incorporate gender-specific data into clinical decision-making. A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline was implemented to analyze a curated dataset of 20 scientific articles using three distinct Large Language Models (LLMs): kronos483/Llama-3.2-3B-PubMed, deepseek-v2, and mistral-small-3.2. The evaluation revealed distinct trade-offs between the models. Mistral-small-3.2 achieved the highest average F 1 score, while deepseek-v2 delivered the highest average Precision but failed to assign gender-sensitivity scores. The performance of Llama-3.2 was comparable to Mistral’s, but its responses occasionally included faulty information. The findings confirm that this RAG-based approach could be a feasible method for generating promising, gender-sensitive clinical insights, demonstrating a path toward more equitable and personalized AI-supported healthcare.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Randomized Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Women
1998 · 6.246 Zit.
Sex differences in immune responses
2016 · 6.044 Zit.
<i>International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems</i>
2014 · 3.584 Zit.
The Problem With the Phrase <i>Women and Minorities:</i> Intersectionality—an Important Theoretical Framework for Public Health
2012 · 2.747 Zit.
Toward a New Psychology of Women.
1977 · 2.347 Zit.