Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatology: From Algorithms to Clinical Impact in Osteoporosis and Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
<b>Background</b>: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming medicine by supporting data-driven diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized care. In rheumatology, AI applications are rapidly expanding in imaging, disease monitoring, and therapeutic decision support. This review aimed to summarize current evidence on AI in osteoporosis and chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, with a focus on methodological robustness and clinical applicability. <b>Methods</b>: A narrative review was conducted following SANRA criteria. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published between January 2015 and July 2025 using MeSH terms and free-text keywords related to AI, osteoporosis, and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A total of 323 articles were included. <b>Results</b>: Machine learning and deep learning models show strong performance in osteoporosis for predicting bone mineral density (BMD), bone loss, and fractures. In chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, AI improves imaging interpretation, particularly for sacroiliitis. AI tools also demonstrate potential for predicting disease risk and activity, diagnostic support and treatment response. Hybrid models combining imaging, clinical, and biological data appear particularly promising. However, most studies rely on retrospective single-center datasets, with limited external validation, suboptimal explainability, and scarce evidence of real-world implementation. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI holds significant promise for advancing diagnosis and personalized management in osteoporosis and rheumatic diseases. However, major challenges persist, including heterogeneous data quality, inconsistent methodological reporting, limited clinical validation, and barriers to integration into routine practice. Bridging the gap between algorithmic performance and clinical impact will require prospective studies, robust validation frameworks, and strategies to build trust among clinicians and patients.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis
1988 · 19.863 Zit.
2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative
2010 · 9.381 Zit.
Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
1988 · 7.818 Zit.
Revised Criteria for the Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis
1990 · 7.734 Zit.
Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee
1986 · 6.710 Zit.