Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Clinical prediction methods as a learning tool in medical education
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the need to develop the ability of medical students to make clinical prediction as a key component of professional thinking. The aim is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a training module on methods for predicting treatment outcomes in the training of future doctors. Research methods: modified Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), Clinical Reasoning Test, analytical test Medical Logic, self-assessment questionnaire, semi-structured group interview. As a result, the experimental group (EG) students (n=50) demonstrated significantly higher indicators on all criteria compared to the control group (CG) (n=50): Clinical Reasoning Test – 7.8 versus 5.1 points; OSCE – 8.3 versus 5.5; analytical thinking – 26.1 versus 19.2 points; improved self-esteem – up to +2.2 points. The training module turned out to be effective for the development of clinical reasoning, decision logic, and professional confidence. The academic novelty of the study is the first-ever approved integration of clinical prediction scales (CHA₂DS₂-VASc, SHFM, APACHE II, etc.) as a didactic tool in the Clinical Reasoning course. The prospects for future research is scaling up the module for interdisciplinary training, as well as in studying its impact on real clinical decisions of interns.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Research Note
1997 · 14.546 Zit.
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.700 Zit.
QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
2011 · 13.556 Zit.
A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions
1981 · 11.455 Zit.
Evidence-Based Medicine
1992 · 4.136 Zit.