Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Machine learning-based COVID-19 prognostic models lag behind in reporting quality: findings from a TRIPOD/TRIPOD + AI systematic review
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Lower adherence among machine learning studies reflects the relatively recent publication of the TRIPOD + AI guidelines (April 2024), which postdate many of the included studies. Both conventional and machine learning-based prediction models showed insufficient reporting, with major gaps in model description and performance reporting. Greater compliance with reporting guidelines is critical to improving the clarity, reproducibility, and clinical value of prediction model research.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study
2020 · 22.636 Zit.
La certeza de lo impredecible: Cultura Educación y Sociedad en tiempos de COVID19
2020 · 19.284 Zit.
A Multi-Modal Distributed Real-Time IoT System for Urban Traffic Control (Invited Paper)
2024 · 14.279 Zit.
UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
2018 · 8.658 Zit.
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
2021 · 7.284 Zit.