Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Operationalizing AI risk frameworks in financial services: A second line of defense perspective
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
The proliferation of artificial intelligence systems within financial services organizations has created unprecedented challenges for second line of defense risk oversight functions tasked with providing independent risk assessment while enabling innovation. This research addresses the critical gap between theoretical AI risk frameworks and their operational implementation by examining 150 financial institutions across banking, insurance, and investment sectors. Through a comprehensive mixed-methods study combining quantitative analysis of AI risk assessments and qualitative interviews with 78 2LOD practitioners, this article develops a maturity model for AI risk governance and introduces the Transverse AI Risk Assessment Methodology (TARAM). The study reveals that 73% of financial institutions lack integrated approaches to AI risk management, treating technology, data, operational, and compliance risks in isolation despite their interconnected nature. TARAM addresses this deficiency by providing a unified framework that enables simultaneous assessment across all risk domains while maintaining regulatory compliance with SOX, GDPR, NYDFS, and emerging AI-specific regulations. Empirical validation demonstrates that organizations implementing TARAM achieve 47% faster AI use case approval times, 62% reduction in post-deployment risk incidents, and 89% improvement in regulatory examination outcomes. The research contributes novel risk categorization frameworks that balance innovation velocity with risk appetite, practical guidance for integrating AI-specific controls into SDLC processes, and actionable strategies for 2LOD functions to provide effective oversight without impeding business objectives. This work bridges the critical divide between high-level governance principles and day-to-day operational risk management, offering financial services organizations a pragmatic pathway to realize AI's transformative potential while maintaining robust risk oversight.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.504 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.856 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.378 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.267 Zit.
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
1987 · 3.182 Zit.