Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
AI for Emergency Department Predictions
0
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Emergency departments face constant pressure from overcrowding, making early prediction of patient admission a valuable support for clinicians. In this study, we used the MIMIC-IV-ED v2.2 dataset, containing about 296,000 visits and 38 triage-level features, to develop and compare multiple machine learning models for admission prediction. Across five approaches—Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and a Deep Neural Network—performance ranged from moderate to strong, achieving AUROC values up to 0.84 and balanced accuracy around 77%. Despite these results, recall for admitted patients remained around 60%, indicating that many potential admissions were not detected. Explainable AI methods (SHAP and LIME) identified triage acuity, patient age, arrival transport, and medication counts as key drivers of model decisions. Fairness analysis revealed demographic disparities, with younger patients predicted more accurately than older adults, and elderly women particularly disadvantaged. Compression experiments further showed that quantisation and pruning reduced model size and latency with minimal performance loss. The study highlights the potential of predictive triage systems while underscoring the importance of fairness monitoring, calibration, and regulatory compliance before deployment.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation
1987 · 49.433 Zit.
APACHE II
1985 · 13.589 Zit.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2003 · 11.306 Zit.
Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care
2001 · 8.576 Zit.
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.
1974 · 8.023 Zit.