Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Why We Should Reject to Reject the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Analysis: A Response to Jowsey, Braun, Clarke, Lupton, and Fine (2025)
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
This position paper argues against the categorical rejection of generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) in qualitative analysis, as proposed by Jowsey et al. in their open letter published in Qualitative Inquiry . While their concerns are framed as methodological, the authors’ position largely rests on philosophical assumptions that risk becoming dogma. In this short response I contend that prohibiting genAI on metaphysical grounds negatively impacts debate and innovation in qualitative analysis.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
1968 · 46.599 Zit.
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
1994 · 45.602 Zit.
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
2005 · 42.771 Zit.
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
1991 · 39.925 Zit.
Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
1998 · 38.908 Zit.