Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Mini-review on human-centered assurance in robot-assisted orthopedics and neurosurgery
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) drives the development of next-generation robotic platforms and navigation systems that operate with increasing levels of autonomy in orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures, the methods by which human operators verify and validate these systems' operations become critically important. While significant effort has been spent on advancing technological capabilities and autonomy, comparatively little thought has been put into understanding how surgeons may effectively maintain oversight and assurance of these complex systems-despite retaining full legal and ethical responsibility for surgical outcomes. This mini-review synthesizes assurance mechanisms following the Sense-Think-Act framework: spatial intelligence (navigation and registration), cognitive assistance (AI-driven planning and adaptation), and physical operation (robot motion and force interaction). We highlight human-centered assurance as an opportunity to enable safe adoption of increasingly autonomous surgical systems. Finally, we outline essential research directions for developing assurance frameworks that scale with increasing autonomy while maintaining human responsibility and control in orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The SCARE 2020 Guideline: Updating Consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) Guidelines
2020 · 5.573 Zit.
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
2002 · 2.792 Zit.
An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data
2008 · 2.508 Zit.
Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents
1997 · 2.259 Zit.
Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence
2011 · 1.710 Zit.