Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Causal blind spots when using prediction models for treatment decisions
0
Zitationen
15
Autoren
2024
Jahr
Abstract
Prediction models are increasingly proposed for guiding treatment decisions, but most fail to address the special role of treatments, leading to inappropriate use. This paper highlights the limitations of using standard prediction models for treatment decision support. We identify 'causal blind spots' in three common approaches to handling treatments in prediction modelling and illustrate potential harmful consequences in several medical applications. We advocate for an extension of guidelines for development, reporting, clinical evaluation and monitoring of prediction models to ensure that the intended use of the model is matched to an appropriate risk estimand. For decision support this requires a shift towards developing predictions under the specific treatment options under consideration ('predictions under interventions'). We argue that this will improve the efficacy of prediction models in guiding treatment decisions and prevent potential negative effects on patient outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Applied logistic regression
1990 · 35.647 Zit.
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
1983 · 30.382 Zit.
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
2004 · 16.976 Zit.
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
1999 · 13.356 Zit.
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
1982 · 12.542 Zit.