Assessing the robustness and clinical evaluation of a deep-learning segmentation model for head and neck cancer.

Abstract

Background And Purpose Deep learning (DL)-based autosegmentation has improved delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, automated segmentation of gross tumor volumes (GTVp, GTVn) remains challenging, and robustness under real-world imaging conditions is insufficiently characterized. This study evaluates the robustness and clinical usability of a DL-based PET/CT segmentation model for HNC under clinically relevant perturbations. Materials And Methods A 3D Dynamic U-Net was trained on the public HECKTOR 2022 dataset (474 training, 50 test cases). Synthetic perturbations (noise, blur, ghosting, bias-field, spike noise, and motion) were applied to PET and CT images at varying severity levels, generating 36 variants per patient. Segmentation quality was measured using Dice score, Hausdorff Distance, and accuracy. Clinical usability was assessed for 50 baseline and 18 perturbed cases by two clinicians using a five-point Likert scale. Radiomic features were correlated with robustness metrics. Results Baseline Dice scores were 0.766 (GTVp) and 0.698 (GTVn). Performance dropped significantly under spike noise and bias-field artifacts, especially for GTVn. Clinical usability remained high for GTVp (77.8%) but declined to 27.9% for GTVn under severe perturbations. Lesion volume and surface complexity positively correlated with robustness degradation, while high PET contrast offered protective effects against certain perturbations. Conclusion DL-based PET/CT segmentation models for HNC show strong baseline performance and robustness for primary tumors. However, nodal tumor segmentation remains vulnerable to specific image artifacts. Enhancing robustness through targeted data augmentation and validation under variable conditions is essential for clinical integration.

Ähnliche Arbeiten