Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethical Fairness without Demographics in Human-Centered AI
0
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Computational models are increasingly embedded in human-centered domains such as healthcare, education, workplace analytics, and digital well-being, where their predictions directly influence individual outcomes and collective welfare. In such contexts, achieving high accuracy alone is insufficient; models must also act ethically and equitably across diverse populations. However, fair AI approaches that rely on demographic attributes are impractical, as such information is often unavailable, privacy-sensitive, or restricted by regulatory frameworks. Moreover, conventional parity-based fairness approaches, while aiming for equity, can inadvertently violate core ethical principles by trading off subgroup performance or stability. To address this challenge, we present Flare (Fisher-guided LAtent-subgroup learning with do-no-harm REgularization), the first demographic-agnostic framework that aligns algorithmic fairness with ethical principles through the geometry of optimization. Flare leverages Fisher Information to regularize curvature, uncovering latent disparities in model behavior without access to demographic or sensitive attributes. By integrating representation, loss, and curvature signals, it identifies hidden performance strata and adaptively refines them through collaborative but do-no-harm optimization, enhancing each subgroup's performance while preserving global stability and ethical balance. We also introduce BHE (Beneficence-Harm Avoidance-Equity), a novel metric suite that operationalizes ethical fairness evaluation beyond statistical parity. Extensive evaluations across diverse physiological (EDA), behavioral (IHS), and clinical (OhioT1DM) datasets show that Flare consistently enhances ethical fairness compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.784 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.893 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.541 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.313 Zit.
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
2018 · 3.257 Zit.