Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ethical oversight of AI-driven paediatric trials: a proactive, risk-sensitive interim review model
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven paediatric trials pose novel challenges for institutional review boards (IRBs), as traditional annual continuing review frameworks are often inadequate for evolving algorithmic and data-related risks. International and national regulations provide only limited guidance on how to design proactive, risk-sensitive interim oversight mechanisms for such research. Objective: To develop and illustrate a risk-sensitive interim review model that strengthens participant protection and procedural fairness in AI-enabled paediatric research. Methods: = 100, aged 3-7 years) is presented as a worked example rather than empirical data collection. Results: The model comprises five interlocking components: (1) scheduled, risk-based interim reviews and audits; (2) structured deviation-triggered response procedures; (3) mechanisms for re-consent and ongoing communication; (4) continuous ethics and protocol training; and (5) transparent, auditable documentation and IRB-investigator communication. Application of the proposed model to the Taiwanese worked example illustrates how a structured, risk-sensitive interim review process can support the identification of informed-consent and eligibility-screening deviations, facilitate targeted corrective training, and promote routine documentation monitoring. Conclusions: A proactive, risk-sensitive interim review model can support IRBs in shifting from reactive annual oversight to continuous, adaptive governance aligned with AI-specific risk profiles. The model offers a transferable, principle-based template for strengthening ethical oversight of AI-driven pediatric trials across diverse regulatory and cultural settings.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects
2003 · 10.822 Zit.
SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials
2013 · 7.011 Zit.
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
1995 · 5.586 Zit.
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
2020 · 5.433 Zit.
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.806 Zit.