Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
From AI-driven HRM to engaged employees: the critical role of perceived organizational justice
0
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2026
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose This study investigates how artificial intelligence (AI) shapes employees’ workplace experiences. Specifically, it examines the direct effect of AI-driven human resource management (AI-HRM) on employee engagement (EE) and further explores its indirect effect through perceived organizational justice (POJ). Design/methodology/approach A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed in this study. Data were collected from banking sector employees who use AI-enabled HRM applications. Using a snowball sampling method, 374 valid responses were obtained. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to examine the proposed direct and mediating relationships. Findings The findings reveal that AI-HRM practices have a significant positive impact on EE and POJ. Furthermore, POJ partially mediates the relationship between AI-HRM and job engagement, highlighting the role of justice perceptions in shaping employees’ responses to AI-supported HRM systems. Practical implications The results provide actionable insights for senior managers, HR professionals and artificial intelligence system developers in the banking sector. Effective implementation of AI-HRM can enhance employee engagement, promote AI readiness, improve performance outcomes and support continuous skill development. Originality/value This study extends social exchange theory, sociotechnical systems theory and organizational justice theory within the context of artificial intelligence. It demonstrates how AI-driven HRM practices influence employee engagement through fairness perceptions, integrates technological systems into social exchange mechanisms and conceptualizes AI-HRM as a sociotechnical structure that shapes employee attitudes and behaviors.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
2019 · 4.806 Zit.
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
2016 · 3.895 Zit.
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
2004 · 3.552 Zit.
Fairness through awareness
2012 · 3.317 Zit.
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations
2018 · 3.289 Zit.