OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 20.05.2026, 21:25

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

SΔϕ-49 — AI Poverty as Failure Non-Reentry Resource Deficit: Context, Tool, Authority, Verification, Feedback, Editability, and Re-entry Path Deficits (v1.1, AI-Readable Package)

2026·13 Zitationen·Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Open Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

13

Zitationen

1

Autoren

2026

Jahr

Abstract

SΔϕ-49 defines AI Poverty as a failure non-reentry resource-deficit condition within the Sofience–Δϕ Formalism Series. The central claim is that AI Poverty is not simple stupidity, low capability, or a single wrong answer. It is a condition after failure in which the system lacks the resources required to return to correction: context, tools, authority, verification, feedback, editability, or a re-entry path. This AI-readable package extends the source SΔϕ-49 paper on AI Poverty, Failure, and Non-Reentry. It distinguishes error, failure, non-reentry, and poverty. Error is a wrong or unstable output. Failure is error plus operational cost. Non-reentry is failure after which the system cannot return to a stable correction path. AI Poverty is the resource-deficit condition that makes re-entry fail. The package decomposes SΔϕ-49 into operational files for AI ingestion, including a canonical v1.1 paper, source v1.0 paper and extracted text, core declaration, AI quickstart, minimal prompt, AI Poverty schema, poverty-axis taxonomy, context poverty, tool poverty, authority poverty, verification poverty, feedback poverty, editability poverty, re-entry path poverty, error/failure/poverty distinctions, non-reentry protocol, failure-to-correction path, severity scale, output templates, misreadings, failure modes, relation files, metadata, citation file, DOI references, license, and manifest. The framework is intended for AI failure audit, non-reentry diagnosis, missing tool/context/authority analysis, verification poverty diagnosis, feedback poverty diagnosis, editability failure, repair TCC estimation, and Slop prevention through repair-resource disclosure. It should not be used as an insult, as a synonym for stupidity, as a replacement for source verification, or as an excuse for avoidable failure.

Ähnliche Arbeiten

Autoren

Themen

Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationLaw, AI, and Intellectual Property
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen