Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Theoretical, empirical and practical approaches to resolving the unmet information needs of clinical information system users.
64
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2002
Jahr
Abstract
We hypothesize that when clinicians review clinical data in an electronic medical record, the information needs that arise are predictable, based on a number of situational factors. Because our theory does not say, exactly, what those needs are, we are using an empirical approach (observation) to detecting and categorizing them. For each need, we can construct an "infobutton" that links the clinical data to an on-line information resource. We have constructed an Infobutton Manager to match the data being reviewed by clinicians with context-appropriate infobuttons. This paper describes how the theory, observations, and practical solutions can come together to improve clinician decision making by resolving information needs.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 83.106 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.627 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 62.265 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
2009 · 45.128 Zit.
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
2009 · 27.822 Zit.