Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Does a High Tech (Computerized, Animated, Powerpoint) Presentation Increase Retention of Material Compared to a Low Tech (Black on Clear Overheads) Presentation?
27
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2005
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computerized digital presentations have become standard in most medical schools without research proving their effectiveness. PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine if differences in (a) subjective evaluation; (b) short-term retention of material; and (c) long-term retention of material occurred with the use of static overheads versus computerized, animated PowerPoint for a presentation to medical students. METHODS: All students rotating on a required clerkship attended a standard lecture presented by 1 faculty member. The content of the presentation remained the same, but the instructional media varied (overheads on even months, animated PowerPoint on odd months). Students completed a posttest and subjective evaluation immediately following the lecture and repeated the posttest 1 year later. Unpaired t tests were used to compare the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups on any parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, students rated both types of presentation equally and displayed no differences in short- or long-term retention of material.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha
2011 · 13.998 Zit.
Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world
2010 · 5.750 Zit.
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
2012 · 5.513 Zit.
The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance
1990 · 4.707 Zit.
Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
2006 · 4.677 Zit.