Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Attitudes and Perceptions about Clinical Guidelines: A Qualitative Study with Spanish Physicians
47
Zitationen
15
Autoren
2014
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines (CGs) are popular for healthcare decision making but their acceptability and use by healthcare providers is influenced by numerous factors. Some of these factors are professional-related, such as knowledge and perceptions of and attitudes toward CGs in general. The aim of our study was to evaluate attitudes and perceptions of Spanish physicians towards CGs. METHODS: We coordinated six discussion groups with a total of 46 physicians. The participants were drawn from 12 medical specialties from both specialized and primary care. We recorded the sessions and transcribed the content verbatim. We analyzed the data using an approach based on the grounded theory. RESULTS: We identified two main constructs that defined the physicians' perceptions towards guidelines: knowledge and usefulness. "Knowledge" defined the theoretical meanings of guidelines, while "Usefulness" referred to the pragmatic approach to guidelines. These constructs were interrelated through a series of categories such as confidence, usability, accessibility, dissemination and formats. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the constructs that impacted most on physician's attitudes to clinical guidelines were knowledge and usefulness. The tension between the theoretical and the pragmatic constructs determined the attitudes and how physicians use guidelines. Groups developing guidelines should ask relevant clinical questions and develop implementable and context specific recommendations. Developers should be explicit and consistent in the development and presentation of recommendations.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.533 Zit.
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
2008 · 25.073 Zit.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
2008 · 21.558 Zit.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
1998 · 16.869 Zit.
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
1996 · 15.608 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre(ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública(ES)
- Universidad de Navarra(ES)
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona(ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red(ES)
- Ministry of Health(ES)
- Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya(ES)
- Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla(ES)
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío(ES)
- Universidad de Sevilla(ES)
- Gobierno de Navarra(ES)
- Departamento de Salud(ES)
- Universidade da Coruña(ES)
- Servicio Gallego de Salud(ES)
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña(ES)
- Ayuntamiento de San Sebastián(ES)
- Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute(ES)
- Osasun Sistemen Ikerketa Institutua(ES)
- Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud(ES)