Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs
228
Zitationen
14
Autoren
2015
Jahr
Abstract
Over the last 5 years, stimulated by the changing healthcare environment and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Meaningful Use (MU) Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive program, EHR adoption has increased remarkably, and there is early evidence that such adoption has resulted in healthcare safety and quality benefits.1,2 However, with this broad adoption, many clinicians are voicing concerns that EHR use has had unintended clinical consequences, including reduced time for patient-clinician interaction,3 new and burdensome data entry tasks being transferred to front-line clinicians,4,5 and lengthened clinician workdays.6–8 Additionally, interoperability between different EHR systems has languished despite large efforts towards that goal.9,10 These challenges are contributing to physicians’ decreased satisfaction with their work lives.11–13 In professional journals,14 press reports,15–17 on wards, and in clinics, we have heard of the difficulties that the transition from paper records to EHRs has created.18 As a result, clinicians are seeking help to get through their work days, which often extend into evenings devoted to writing notes. Examples of comments we have received from clinicians and patients include: “Computers always make things faster and cheaper. Not this time,” and “My doctor pays more attention to the computer than to me.” Ultimately the healthcare system's goal is to create a robust, integrated, and interoperable healthcare system that includes patients, physician practices, public health, population management, and support for clinical and basic sciences research. This ecosystem has been referred to as the “learning health system.”19 EHRs are an important part of the learning health system, along with many other clinical systems, but future ways in which information is transformed into knowledge will likely require all parts of the system working together. Potentially every patient encounter could present an …
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Machine Learning in Medicine
2019 · 3.732 Zit.
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
2006 · 3.173 Zit.
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes
2005 · 2.966 Zit.
Studies in health technology and informatics
2008 · 2.903 Zit.
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
2005 · 2.698 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- University of Washington(US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs(US)
- Veterans Health Administration(US)
- National Patient Safety Foundation(US)
- NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital(US)
- Kaiser Permanente(US)
- Cerner (United States)(US)
- National Institutes of Health(US)
- United States National Library of Medicine(US)
- Palo Alto Institute(US)
- Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis(US)
- Regenstrief Institute(US)
- Indiana University School of Medicine
- University of Utah(US)
- Sparrow Health System(US)
- Michigan State University(US)