Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
How Good Are the Data? Feasible Approach to Validation of Metrics of Quality Derived From an Outpatient Electronic Health Record
32
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2011
Jahr
Abstract
Although electronic health records (EHRs) promise to be efficient resources for measuring metrics of quality, they are not designed for such population-based analyses. Thus, extracting meaningful clinical data from them is not straightforward. To avoid poorly executed measurements, standardized methods to measure and to validate metrics of quality are needed. This study provides and evaluates a use case for a generally applicable approach to validating quality metrics measured electronically from EHR-based data. The authors iteratively refined and validated 4 outpatient quality metrics and classified errors in measurement. Multiple iterations of validation and measurement resulted in high levels of sensitivity and agreement versus the "gold standard" of manual review. In contrast, substantial differences remained for measurement based on coded billing data. Measuring quality metrics using an EHR-based electronic process requires validation to ensure accuracy; approaches to validation such as those described in this study should be used by organizations measuring quality from EHR-based information.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Machine Learning in Medicine
2019 · 3.773 Zit.
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
2006 · 3.173 Zit.
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes
2005 · 2.970 Zit.
Studies in health technology and informatics
2008 · 2.903 Zit.
An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success
2020 · 2.716 Zit.