Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Detecting clinically significant events through automated language analysis: Quo imus?
25
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2016
Jahr
Abstract
We found the recent paper by Bedi et al. 1 simultaneously exciting, heartening and, sadly, a bit discouraging. It shows that modern, statistical natural language processing (NLP) and machinelearning (ML) techniques can potentially be useful as a component of diagnosis, here predicting who among those at risk will eventually transition to full-blown psychosis. This result follows closely our own and others observations of the value of these techniques in, for example, discriminating patients with schizophrenia from controls, 2 discriminating schizophrenia probands, first-degree relatives and unrelated healthy controls, 3 differentiating those at high risk of psychosis from unrelated putatively healthy participants 4 and in a candidate gene study linking language in general to underlying neurobiology, 5 all quite encouraging outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.704 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.545 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.931 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.532 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.046 Zit.