Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Clinical prediction rules: A systematic review of healthcare provider opinions and preferences
36
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2018
Jahr
Abstract
Some of the objections and preferences stated by healthcare providers are inherent to the nature of the clinical problem addressed, which may or may not be within the designer's capacity to change; however, others (in particular - actionability, validation, integration and provision of high quality education materials) should be considered by prediction rule designers and implementation teams, in order to increase user acceptance and improve uptake of these tools. We summarise these findings across the clinical prediction rule lifecycle and pose questions for the rule developers, in order to produce tools that are more likely to successfully translate into clinical practice.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.801 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.558 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.993 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.605 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.133 Zit.