Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
A year in statistics—the view from the trenches
1
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Last year we launched the EBM Methods Verdicts as part of an attempt to keep on top of developments in statistics that will impact on the way we do research.1 2 We focused on statistical methods and in particular on the output from five different journals: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , Statistics in Medicine , Statistical Methods in Medical Research , BMC Medical Research Methodology and Biostatistics . The idea is simple: identify papers that we believe are likely to change the way we analyse or report evidence syntheses, randomised trials or studies related to diagnosis, prognosis or monitoring. Our editorial team typically focuses on one of these per month and aims to write a short commentary with a ‘verdict’ explaining how this will change how we do things. We are also interested in people submitting proposals for similar short pieces. Bayesian neural networks were the rage in the early 90s. Work in this area seemed to go quiet for most of the 00s but has exploded back into our consciousness in the last few years. This is clear by the number of papers published on the topic (figure 1) with nearly half of the total appearing in the last 2 …
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.259 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.629 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.143 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.535 Zit.
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future
2017 · 4.396 Zit.