Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
KnowRisk: An Interpretable Knowledge-Guided Model for Disease Risk Prediction
30
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2019
Jahr
Abstract
Thanks to the widespread adoption of Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems, a variety of data-driven clinical risk prediction approaches have been spawned in recent years. However, there remain three challenges, which if addressed would improve the performance and applicability of such models. (i) Due to the limited data sharing between different health care institutions, the EHR data collected by a single institution is often inadequate or missing some visits records. The limited number of data cannot meet the large sample required of recent approaches especially deep learning models. In addition, the missing records (due to visiting different institution) may contain important health condition of the patient, which if ignored would cause prediction bias. (ii) Few existing approaches take clinical knowledge into account. The auxiliary knowledge if included can greatly reduce the data dependency of many modern learning algorithms. (iii) Most existing deep learning based methods are unable to identify the contribution of each medical event to the final results, which prohibits such models from being widely accepted in practical clinical applications. In this paper, we propose an interpretable and knowledge-guided deep model to address these challenges. Specifically, we distill knowledge from a clinical knowledge graph both explicitly and implicitly, which can not only supplement inadequate patient records but also guide the predicting process of the model. Furthermore, skip-connections and attention mechanisms are adopted to improve the interpretability of our model. In the context of heart failure prediction task, our model outperforms several state-of-the-art methods. Finally, a series of case studies are presented to prove the interpretability of our model.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.785 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.554 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.982 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.