OpenAlex · Aktualisierung stündlich · Letzte Aktualisierung: 15.03.2026, 02:28

Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in breast cancer care - Leveraging multidisciplinary skills to improve care

2020·10 Zitationen·The BreastOpen Access
Volltext beim Verlag öffnen

10

Zitationen

4

Autoren

2020

Jahr

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies supporting health professionals’ skills bring the promise of an era in which repetitive and time-intensive tasks in healthcare can be automated and performed (either entirely or in part) by AI systems. As automation progressively facilitates the delivery of health care, physicians can now focus on more humanized patient care. The use of AI to ensure quality delivery is essential in the fight against diseases and there is no doubt that the next decade will see a growing stream of AI applications across healthcare. “We are not ready for what is about to come” Coiera tells us [[1]Coiera E. The price of artificial intelligence.Yearbk Med Inform. 2019; 28: 14-25https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1677892Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar], a statement highlighting the need for healthcare practitioners and services to prepare for AI’s adoption into health practice. With the progress of AI systems, it seems obvious that machine thinking will invade our workspace, literally and figuratively, in all areas of breast cancer care. Instead of resisting, we should better consider preparing ourselves for the impact, the potential, and the pitfalls, and start adapting our work environment to this new reality. This progress will need big input from “both sides of the barricade”, namely AI technical experts and health care professionals. Fear of the unknown is a common obstacle in innovation and frequently leads to resistance to new approaches. This is also the situation with AI in health care, although in this instance, cautious planning and evaluation are needed to allow us to understand the most beneficial way to adopt AI in practice. To achieve this, healthcare professionals including doctors need to work closely with AI experts. However, many doctors are not at ease with the computer science language, and computer scientists and engineers don’t master health terminology and concepts. Moreover, these very divergent skills appear to focus on different objectives. While health professionals have the primary goal of better diagnosis and treatment for patients, computer science teams are focused on inventing methods and computational processes to solve questions that might, in some instances, be considered of less priority to those who actually manage patients in real-word health settings. So, to make progress in our endeavor to use AI to improve various aspects of clinical care, in general and in our focus on breast cancer, we need to communicate our different perspectives more efficiently and more effectively. To help solve this problem, a curriculum teaching the language used and the problems addressed both by AI scientists and healthcare professionals could be implemented both in pre-graduate and post-graduate education, as highlighted in the work from Ferreira et al. in this special issue [[2]Ferreira M.F. Savoy J.N. Markey M.K. Teaching cross-cultural design thinking for healthcare.Breast. 2020; 50: 1-10https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.015Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar]. Many of the subfields of AI in health care are represented in this collection of papers addressing some of the developments that will help us in the routine care of breast cancer patients. It is obvious that many of the tasks that are undertaken very frequently by human operators with their inherent subjectivity will be the ones most likely to be replaced successfully in the near future by AI-based systems. One of the most relevant fields of research is the use of image analysis in various clinical applications including breast imaging, digital pathology, surgical planning, and outcomes evaluation. The huge amount of imaging digital data already annotated with defined characteristics either in screening or diagnosis has allowed the development of machine-learning-derived solutions that are on the verge of becoming a part of our practices in the near future. On the methodological side, contributions to this special issue come from the papers by Ref. [[3]Yap M.H. Goyal M. Osman F. Martí R. Denton E. Juette A. Zwiggelaar R. Breast ultrasound region of interest detection and lesion localisation.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101880Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar,[4]Carvalho E.D. Filho A.O. Silva R.R. Araújo F.H. Diniz J.O. Silva A.C. … Gattass M. Breast cancer diagnosis from histopathological images using textural features and CBIR.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 105https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101845Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar]. Yap et al. move from a set of ultrasound breast images and use an accurate object detection deep learning framework (namely, Faster-RCNN with Inception-ResNet-v2): region of interest (ROI) detection and lesion localization are automatically performed, helping the surgeon to focus on the relevant area of the breast. Carvalho et al. propose a method which deploys phylogenetic diversity indexes, generally used in biology to compare the behavior patterns of species in different areas, applied in this work to characterize breast histopathology images: the resulting model classifies histopathological images of the breast into four classes - invasive carcinoma, in situ carcinoma, normal tissue, and benign lesion – leaving a possible promise for the future of reducing the number of needed biopsies. Other papers in this special issue are also dedicated to the use of AI in breast imaging, screening, diagnosis, and prognosis as well as the prediction of cancer response to treatment. These topics are reviewed and discussed taking into account the current state of existing applications [5Lee C.I. Houssami N. Elmore J.G. Buist D.S. Pathways to breast cancer screening artificial intelligence algorithm validation.Breast. 2020; 52: 146-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.005Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar, 6Gullo R.L. Eskreis-Winkler S. Morris E.A. Pinker K. Machine learning with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast. 2020; 49: 115-122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.009Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar, 7Sechopoulos I. Mann R.M. Stand-alone artificial intelligence - the future of breast cancer screening?.Breast. 2020; 49: 254-260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.014Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 8Tagliafico A.S. Piana M. Schenone D. Lai R. Massone A.M. Houssami N. Overview of radiomics in breast cancer diagnosis and prognostication.Breast. 2020; 49: 74-80https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.018Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar]. AI has the potential to bring efficiencies to screening programs burdened by screen-reading workload, and augmenting radiologists’ interpretation. Various approaches to using AI in screening are discussed by Sechopoulos and Mann in this issue [[7]Sechopoulos I. Mann R.M. Stand-alone artificial intelligence - the future of breast cancer screening?.Breast. 2020; 49: 254-260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.014Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar], while Lee et al. highlight the pathways and processes needed to ensure validation and diversification of algorithms for screening practice [[5]Lee C.I. Houssami N. Elmore J.G. Buist D.S. Pathways to breast cancer screening artificial intelligence algorithm validation.Breast. 2020; 52: 146-149https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.09.005Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar]. Applications of machine learning to digital pathology for breast cancer, including both diagnostic and prognostic applications, will not only complement the routine work of breast pathologists but also improve their diagnostic accuracy. As described in the detailed review by Ibrahim et al. [[9]Ibrahim A. Gamble P. Jaroensri R. Abdelsamea M.M. Mermel C.H. Chen P.-H.C. Rakha E.A. Artificial intelligence in digital breast pathology: techniques and applications.Breast. 2020; 49: 267-273https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.007Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar], AI in breast cancer pathology will provide information beyond that can be gained by eyeball assessment with the potential to replace some of the expensive multigene assays. In contrast to imaging and pathology where there are already available AI tools and substantial applied research, the sub-specialties in local treatments of breast cancer are relatively lagging behind in AI applications. It is not surprising that AI work in surgery is not commensurate with that described for imaging and pathology. Operating a breast depends on a number of variables that are difficult to collect and standardize. An effort has been made to try to transfer the diagnosis imaging information to the operating room, allowing more accurate localization of cancer. This effort has been essentially directed to the fusion of information coming from surface scans with imaging data from MRI allowing the construction of a breast model with the tumor inside, as reported by Bessa et al. [[10]Bessa S. Gouveia P.F. Carvalho P.H. Rodrigues C. Silva N.L. Cardoso F. Cardoso M.J. 3D digital breast cancer models with multimodal fusion algorithms.Breast. 2020; 49: 281-290https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.016Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar]. Some work has also been done in breast reconstruction through image analysis of angio CTs, the routine exam used to plan free flap reconstruction after mastectomy. The capacity to automatically detect vessels from angio CTs, proposed by Mavioso et al. will hopefully replace the process of manual annotation by a computerized automatic analysis keeping the same accuracy levels [[11]Mavioso C. Araújo R.J. Oliveira H.P. Anacleto J.C. Vasconcelos M.A. Pinto D. … Cardoso M.J. Automatic detection of perforators for microsurgical reconstruction.Breast. 2020; 50: 19-24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.001Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar]. Concerning radiotherapy, CT images are the core of treatment planning for each patient, and some facilitating tools already exist for contouring the fields of treatment. However, the use of AI to automate the entire process is not yet used in breast cancer although it could save many hours of work for the radiation oncology team. The paper from Poortmans et al. offers a significant contribution to elucidate the issues related to AI applications to individualize radiation therapy for breast cancer patients [[12]Poortmans P.M. Takanen S. Marta G.N. Meattini I. Kaidar-Person O. Winter is over: the use of Artificial Intelligence to individualise radiation therapy for breast cancer.Breast. 2020; 49: 194-200https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.011Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar]. Beyond using image analysis in diagnostic and planning of treatment, we also need tools to assess the clinical outcomes of this decision. Besides the side effects of systemic treatments, the visible impact of surgery and radiotherapy on patients’ body image is of major importance for patients. Cardoso and colleagues [[13]Cardoso J.S. Silva W. Cardoso M.J. Evolution, current challenges, and future possibilities in the objective assessment of aesthetic outcome of breast cancer locoregional treatment.Breast. 2020; 49: 123-130https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.11.006Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar] offer a review and a discussion of recent advancements in machine learning, and especially deep learning, bringing new promises to the field of aesthetic outcomes of locoregional treatments. Decision support systems are advanced systems that help physicians to diagnose and treat diseases. In fact, the task of physicians is becoming more and more complex because increasing quantities of data need to be properly considered before proceeding with any treatment decision. Indeed, because medical knowledge is advancing, different categories of cancer are proliferating along with the number of new therapies stemming from clinical research and new surgery techniques, which dramatically widen the set of possible choices of decisions. Decision support systems make use of different methodologies including artificial intelligence, knowledge representation, information visualization, and text mining, among others. On the methodological side, contributions on decision support systems come from the papers by Ref. [[14]Bouaud J. Pelayo S. Lamy J.-B. Prebet C. Ngo C. Teixeira L. … Seroussi B. Implementation of an ontological reasoning to support the guideline-based management of primary breast cancer patients in the DESIREE project.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 101922https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101922Crossref Scopus (8) Google Scholar,[15]Gu D. Su K. Zhao H. A case-based ensemble learning system for explainable breast cancer recurrence prediction.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101858Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar]. Bouaud et al. report about the results of the European-funded DESIREE project, providing breast unit physicians with different complementary therapeutic decision support modules including guideline-based, experience-based, and case-based reasoning. Gu et al. propose an auxiliary decision support system to help doctors improve the accuracy of breast cancer recurrence prediction. Big data analysis refers to the analysis of huge quantities of data which are now collected and stored in any human activity, including healthcare. Such data can be exploited for different targets, e.g., to provide medical staff with suggestion support for care delivery, to reason, and to extract knowledge, as well as to understand the natural language of textual descriptions such as medical reports. Papers by Macias-Garcia et al. [[16]Macı́as-Garcı́a L. Martı́nez-Ballesteros M. Luna-Romera J.M. Garcı́a-Heredia J.M. Garcı́a-Gutiérrez J. Riquelme-Santos J.C. Autoencoded DNA methylation data to predict breast cancer recurrence: machine learning models and gene-weight significance.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101976Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar], and Pozzoli et al. [[17]Pozzoli S. Soliman A. Bahri L. Branca R.M. Girdzijauskas S. Brambilla M. Domain expertise–agnostic feature selection for the analysis of breast cancer data.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 101928https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101928Crossref Scopus (4) Google Scholar] offer significant contributions to the methodological side of the big data topic. Macias-Garcia et al. summarize DNA methylation data to generate new features from the values of CpG sites of patients, to predict breast cancer recurrence. Pozzoli et al. experiment unsupervised learning in the detection and analysis of distinctive proteins for the identification of cancer subtypes. Natural language processing (NLP) refers to the capacity of analyzing free text, i.e., the text in human normal speaking or writing, and of understanding it and, possibly, of extracting knowledge from it. The main sources for NLP are medical reports, where non-coded information is depicted. On the methodological side, one contribution on NLP comes from the paper by Hanyin Wang et al. [[18]Wang H. Li Y. Khan S.A. Luo Y. Prediction of breast cancer distant recurrence using natural language processing and knowledge-guided convolutional neural network.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101977Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar], where the authors propose an automated method to predict breast cancer distant recurrence, using natural language processing and deep learning approaches applied to pathology reports and progress notes of some 6000 patients. Some less established but however emerging and promising areas of AI applications to breast cancer care are also introduced into this issue. Butow and Hoque [[19]Butow P. Hoque E. Using artificial intelligence to analyse and teach communication in healthcare.Breast. 2020; 50: 49-55https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.008Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar] discuss AI use to assess and define effective communication between health professionals and patients. Both communication and teaching of how to communicate are processes that stand essentially on qualitative forms of analysis/evaluation, and the use of machine learning could make these processes more efficient. Moser and Nayaran [[20]Moser E.C. Narayan G. Improving breast cancer care coordination and symptom management by using AI driven predictive toolkits.Breast. 2020; 50: 25-29https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.12.006Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (10) Google Scholar] report on the use of machine learning to detect patterns that help to track the ideal workflow for breast cancer patients from diagnosis to long-term follow-up. The authors propose that electronic records analysis could bring AI modeling into clinical practice to drive well-coordinated, patient-centered cancer care in the complex web of modern healthcare today, yet stressing the need for human presence along these pathways. Kakileti et al. [[21]Kakileti S.T. Madhu H.J. Manjunath G. Wee L. Dekker A. Sampangi S. Personalized risk prediction for breast cancer pre-screening using artificial intelligence and thermal radiomics.Artif Intell Med. 2020; 105https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101854Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar] propose and analyze a new personalized risk framework to identify a high-risk target population for regular screening and early breast cancer detection at The machine learning algorithms to analyze thermal and automatically a breast health risk to four different risk et al. L. A. S. N. N. … L. care processes in breast cancer Intell Med. 2020; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar] analyze data from some electronic health records and a care algorithm to define the most patterns of care. The results allow electronic which pathology classes across the and provide the with relevant help in care A for AI in breast cancer care, and relevant for any of AI in to and issues addressed in the paper by and colleagues W. H. B. Houssami N. The and of using artificial intelligence systems in breast cancer 2020; 49: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], in this special issue. This the and their possible solutions and the importance of thinking on what is to come and addressing AI before This will have to all to the design an effective risk plan that will support the of AI in breast cancer care and in and pathways. AI is to generally in but also in breast cancer care. research is needed to not only the accuracy and of the new processes to what as of care, but also to ensure these AI tools are beyond the where The future could and the way we to it will define how and how clinical skills work with AI skills to the for AI in clinical care for the of breast cancer patients. Such a consider an for using AI and including breast cancer in where AI is as part of healthcare. This us to a future where AI will be used to not only healthcare professionals but also patients, to or clinical and to to an clinical in breast cancer care. The of a special issue on the of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the management of breast cancer by the at the of The special issue have to be contributions on the same coming from different Indeed, each with target research and research have addressed only some of the the have the with a more and of the topic. The special issue have to be papers be both on the different but also be collected all in the of the special issue. As for the special the proposed Intelligence in Breast and the to to the special issue Artificial Intelligence in on the and methodological side, and The Breast on the clinical and medical The in of the the four to in the of the special issue. The four where that have to be by also that should the process to the The four with the help of the and of the in and with the identification of current and major research in the to which have been Some of the issues by both while some are by only one the current and major research considered such as imaging and image machine decision support big data natural language processing have been as personalized and the major research performed a deep analysis of the state of the in to identify the authors to for the special issue. This analysis to on the side and on The Breast on the side and on The Breast side, to papers in the and in The Breast one of the as by the of the and the system of the in to the and the process in the special issue is as The construction of the current special issue effort from many The four are the who in the of a special issue and in the care such an Cardoso and the in of the Breast and Artificial Intelligence in who the the who the and their in of the and from and and the help set the on which this

Ähnliche Arbeiten