Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Artificial Intelligence to Inform Clinical Decision Making: A Practical Solution to An Ethical And Legal Challenge.
0
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
This position paper discusses the challenges of allocating legal and ethical responsibility to stakeholders when artificially intelligent systems (AISs) are used in clinical decision making and offers one possible solution. Clinicians have been identified as at risk of being subject to the tort of negligence if a patient is harmed as a result of their using an AIS in clinical decision making. An ethical model of prospective and retrospective personal moral responsibility is suggested to avoid clinicians being treated as a ‘moral crumple zone’. The adoption of risk pooling could support a shared model of responsibility that could promote both prospective and retrospective personal moral responsibility whist avoiding the need for negligence claims.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.292 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.143 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.539 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.452 Zit.