Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Preferring the devil you know: Potential applicant reactions to artificial intelligence evaluation of interviews
117
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Abstract In search of greater resource savings and efficiencies, companies are turning to new technologies in the interview process, such as artificial intelligence evaluation (AIE). However, little is known about candidate reactions to this new tool. We identified outstanding questions regarding reactions to AIE arising from justice and signaling theories and conducted interviews with 33 professionals to understand their perceptions of AIE use in selection. Participants raised issues related to all four types of justice and indicated that there is a signaling effect of AIE use. Despite acknowledging the superior objectivity of AIE, participants expressed a desire for the maintenance of human elements in the evaluation process, seemingly preferring ‘the devil they know’ (human biases and intuition) rather than the one they do not (AIE algorithm). This result is explored through the lens of uncertainty reduction, discussing theoretical implications for justice and signaling theories, and providing implications for the implementation of AIE in the selection process.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Understanding face recognition
1986 · 3.912 Zit.
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
2002 · 3.843 Zit.
Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.
1995 · 3.619 Zit.
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.
1974 · 3.403 Zit.
Implicit memory: History and current status.
1987 · 2.905 Zit.