Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Structuring clinical text with AI: Old versus new natural language processing techniques evaluated on eight common cardiovascular diseases
30
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
Free-text clinical notes in electronic health records are more difficult for data mining while the structured diagnostic codes can be missing or erroneous. To improve the quality of diagnostic codes, this work extracts diagnostic codes from free-text notes: five old and new word vectorization methods were used to vectorize Stanford progress notes and predict eight ICD-10 codes of common cardiovascular diseases with logistic regression. The models showed good performance, with TF-IDF as the best vectorization model showing the highest AUROC (0.9499-0.9915) and AUPRC (0.2956-0.8072). The models also showed transferability when tested on MIMIC-III data with AUROC from 0.7952 to 0.9790 and AUPRC from 0.2353 to 0.8084. Model interpretability was shown by the important words with clinical meanings matching each disease. This study shows the feasibility of accurately extracting structured diagnostic codes, imputing missing codes, and correcting erroneous codes from free-text clinical notes for information retrieval and downstream machine-learning applications.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.785 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.554 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.982 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.