Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Models to Identify Congenital Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> With the dearth of trained care providers to diagnose congenital heart disease (CHD) and a surge in machine learning (ML) models, this review aims to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of such models for detecting CHD. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive literature search in the PubMed, CINAHL, Wiley Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies that reported the diagnostic ability of ML for the detection of CHD compared to the reference standard were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using Quality Assessment for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The sensitivity and specificity results from the studies were used to generate the hierarchical Summary ROC (HSROC) curve. <b>Results:</b> We included 16 studies (1217 participants) that used ML algorithm to diagnose CHD. Neural networks were used in seven studies with overall sensitivity of 90.9% (95% CI 85.2-94.5%) and specificity was 92.7% (95% CI 86.4-96.2%). Other ML models included ensemble methods, deep learning and clustering techniques but did not have sufficient number of studies for a meta-analysis. Majority (<i>n</i>=11, 69%) of studies had a high risk of patient selection bias, unclear bias on index test (<i>n</i>=9, 56%) and flow and timing (<i>n</i>=12, 75%) while low risk of bias was reported for the reference standard (<i>n</i>=10, 62%). <b>Conclusion:</b> ML models such as neural networks have the potential to diagnose CHD accurately without the need for trained personnel. The heterogeneity of the diagnostic modalities used to train these models and the heterogeneity of the CHD diagnoses included between the studies is a major limitation.

Ähnliche Arbeiten