Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
External Validations of Cardiovascular Clinical Prediction Models: A Large-Scale Review of the Literature
72
Zitationen
12
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are many clinical prediction models (CPMs) available to inform treatment decisions for patients with cardiovascular disease. However, the extent to which they have been externally tested, and how well they generally perform has not been broadly evaluated. METHODS: A SCOPUS citation search was run on March 22, 2017 to identify external validations of cardiovascular CPMs in the Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness CPM Registry. We assessed the extent of external validation, performance heterogeneity across databases, and explored factors associated with model performance, including a global assessment of the clinical relatedness between the derivation and validation data. RESULTS: <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many published cardiovascular CPMs have never been externally validated, and for those that have, apparent performance during development is often overly optimistic. A single external validation appears insufficient to broadly understand the performance heterogeneity across different settings.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.785 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.554 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.982 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.591 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.114 Zit.