Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Quantification of BERT Diagnosis Generalizability Across Medical\n Specialties Using Semantic Dataset Distance
7
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2020
Jahr
Abstract
Deep learning models in healthcare may fail to generalize on data from unseen\ncorpora. Additionally, no quantitative metric exists to tell how existing\nmodels will perform on new data. Previous studies demonstrated that NLP models\nof medical notes generalize variably between institutions, but ignored other\nlevels of healthcare organization. We measured SciBERT diagnosis sentiment\nclassifier generalizability between medical specialties using EHR sentences\nfrom MIMIC-III. Models trained on one specialty performed better on internal\ntest sets than mixed or external test sets (mean AUCs 0.92, 0.87, and 0.83,\nrespectively; p = 0.016). When models are trained on more specialties, they\nhave better test performances (p < 1e-4). Model performance on new corpora is\ndirectly correlated to the similarity between train and test sentence content\n(p < 1e-4). Future studies should assess additional axes of generalization to\nensure deep learning models fulfil their intended purpose across institutions,\nspecialties, and practices.\n
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.250 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.109 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.482 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.434 Zit.