Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Ein externer Link zum Volltext ist derzeit nicht verfügbar.
Can Twitter data help in spotting problems early with publications? What retracted COVID-19 papers can teach us about science in the public sphere
0
Zitationen
2
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought science into mainstream public and political debates in novel ways, notably through the widespread use of social media to share and discuss new findings. In this post, Robin Haunschild and Lutz Bornmann discuss their recent findings on how retracted papers were talked about on the social media platform Twitter and how this can be mapped onto the eventual retraction notices of these articles. They suggest that exploring how Twitter and other forms of open post-publication peer review highlight potential errors in the scientific record might serve as an early warning mechanism for spotting research errors.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
2022 · 2.691 Zit.
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
1998 · 2.502 Zit.
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
2012 · 2.313 Zit.
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
2009 · 1.923 Zit.
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
2023 · 1.820 Zit.