Lutz Bornmann

Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication

2008 · 63 Zit. · Scientometrics

Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent

2013 · 35 Zit. · Publications

Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers

2021 · 30 Zit. · Scientometrics

The use of ChatGPT to find similar institutions for institutional benchmarking

2024 · 16 Zit. · Scientometrics

The use of ChatGPT for identifying disruptive papers in science: a first exploration

2024 · 10 Zit. · Scientometrics

The State of Altmetrics: A Tenth Anniversary Celebration

2020 · 5 Zit. · Insecta mundi

Can Twitter data help in spotting problems early with publications? What retracted COVID-19 papers can teach us about science in the public sphere

2021 · 0 Zit. · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)

Leveraging Large Language Models for Post-Publication Peer Review: Potential and Limitations

2025 · 0 Zit.

Finding “similar” universities using <scp>ChatGPT</scp> for institutional benchmarking: A large‐scale comparison of European universities

2025 · 0 Zit. · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

A Decade of In-text Citation Analysis based on Natural Language\n Processing and Machine Learning Techniques: An overview of empirical studies

2020 · 0 Zit. · arXiv (Cornell University)

Research misconduct: definitions, manifestations and extent

2013 · 0 Zit. · arXiv (Cornell University)