Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Predicting Prolonged Length of ICU Stay through Machine Learning
39
Zitationen
6
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
This study aimed to construct machine learning (ML) models for predicting prolonged length of stay (pLOS) in intensive care units (ICU) among general ICU patients. A multicenter database called eICU (Collaborative Research Database) was used for model derivation and internal validation, and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database was used for external validation. We used four different ML methods (random forest, support vector machine, deep learning, and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT)) to develop prediction models. The prediction performance of the four models were compared with the customized simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II. The area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), estimated calibration index (ECI), and Brier score were used to measure performance. In internal validation, the GBDT model achieved the best overall performance (Brier score, 0.164), discrimination (AUROC, 0.742; AUPRC, 0.537), and calibration (ECI, 8.224). In external validation, the GBDT model also achieved the best overall performance (Brier score, 0.166), discrimination (AUROC, 0.747; AUPRC, 0.536), and calibration (ECI, 8.294). External validation showed that the calibration curve of the GBDT model was an optimal fit, and four ML models outperformed the customized SAPS II model. The GBDT-based pLOS-ICU prediction model had the best prediction performance among the five models on both internal and external datasets. Furthermore, it has the potential to assist ICU physicians to identify patients with pLOS-ICU risk and provide appropriate clinical interventions to improve patient outcomes.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
2016 · 27.496 Zit.
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
2011 · 13.831 Zit.
APACHE II
1985 · 13.632 Zit.
Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in Sepsis
1992 · 13.188 Zit.
The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure
1996 · 11.534 Zit.