The Australian Values and Attitudes on AI (AVA-AI) Study: Methodologically Innovative National Survey about Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Social Services (Preprint)

Abstract

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Artificial intelligence (AI) for use in healthcare and social services is rapidly developing, but this has significant ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). Theoretical and conceptual research in AI ethics is rapidly expanding; empirical research is needed to understand the values and judgements of members of the public, who will be the ultimate recipients of AI-enabled services. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> To assess and compare Australians’ general and particular judgements regarding the use of AI, to compare Australians’ judgements about different healthcare and social service applications of AI, and to determine the attributes of health and social service AI systems that Australians consider most important. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We conducted a survey of the Australian population using an innovative sampling and weighting methodology involving two sample components, one from an omnibus survey using a sample selected by scientific probability sampling methods, and one from a non-probability sampled online panel. The online panel sample was calibrated to the omnibus survey sample using behavioural, lifestyle and socio-demographic variables. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> We included weighted responses from 1950 Australians in the online panel, along with a further 2498 from the omnibus survey for a subset of questions. Both weighted samples were socio-demographically well spread. An estimated 60% of Australians support the development of AI in general, but in specific healthcare scenarios this diminishes to between 27 and 43%, and for social service scenarios between 31 and 39%. While all ethical and social dimensions of AI presented were rated as important, accuracy was consistently the most important and reducing costs the least important; speed was also consistently lower in importance. Four in five Australians valued continued human contact and discretion in service provision more than any speed, accuracy, or convenience that AI systems might provide. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The ethical and social dimensions of AI systems matter to Australians. AI systems should augment rather than replace humans in the provision of both health and social services, and these AI systems should reflect human values. There must be meaningful and active participation of ethicists, social scientists and the public in AI development and implementation, particularly in sensitive and value-laden domains such as healthcare and social services. </sec>

Ähnliche Arbeiten