Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study
70
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Systematic reviews of adverse events potentially have serious issues in terms of the reproducibility of the data extraction, and these errors can mislead the conclusions. Implementation guidelines are urgently required to help authors of future systematic reviews improve the validity of data extraction.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
2021 · 89.186 Zit.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
2009 · 83.022 Zit.
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
1977 · 77.734 Zit.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
2009 · 63.362 Zit.
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
2003 · 62.035 Zit.