Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Clinical Decision Support Stewardship: Best Practices and Techniques to Monitor and Improve Interruptive Alerts
57
Zitationen
10
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
Interruptive clinical decision support systems, both within and outside of electronic health records, are a resource that should be used sparingly and monitored closely. Excessive use of interruptive alerting can quickly lead to alert fatigue and decreased effectiveness and ignoring of alerts. In this review, we discuss the evidence for effective alert stewardship as well as practices and methods we have found useful to assess interruptive alert burden, reduce excessive firings, optimize alert effectiveness, and establish quality governance at our institutions. We also discuss the importance of a holistic view of the alerting ecosystem beyond the electronic health record.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
2022 · 19.568 Zit.
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database
2016 · 8.028 Zit.
Clarifying Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Method
1990 · 5.253 Zit.
The impact of the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database
2001 · 4.573 Zit.
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
2000 · 3.737 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- The Ohio State University(US)
- Nationwide Children's Hospital(US)
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta(US)
- Emory University(US)
- University of Rochester(US)
- University of Cincinnati Medical Center(US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center(US)
- Wake Forest University(US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center(US)
- University of Pennsylvania(US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia(US)