Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
The Big Data Paradox in Clinical Practice
35
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2022
Jahr
Abstract
The big data paradox is a real-world phenomenon whereby as the number of patients enrolled in a study increases, the probability that the confidence intervals from that study will include the truth decreases. This occurs in both observational and experimental studies, including randomized clinical trials, and should always be considered when clinicians are interpreting research data. Furthermore, as data quantity continues to increase in today's era of big data, the paradox is becoming more pernicious. Herein, I consider three mechanisms that underlie this paradox, as well as three potential strategies to mitigate it: (1) improving data quality; (2) anticipating and modeling patient heterogeneity; (3) including the systematic error, not just the variance, in the estimation of error intervals.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
"Why Should I Trust You?"
2016 · 14.794 Zit.
Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data
2005 · 10.558 Zit.
A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networks
2020 · 8.990 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.602 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 8.127 Zit.