Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Ageism and Artificial Intelligence: Protocol for a Scoping Review (Preprint)
0
Zitationen
9
Autoren
2021
Jahr
Abstract
<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a major driver of technological development in the 21st century, yet little attention has been paid to algorithmic biases toward older adults. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This paper documents the search strategy and process for a scoping review exploring how age-related bias is encoded or amplified in AI systems as well as the corresponding legal and ethical implications. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The scoping review follows a 6-stage methodology framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley. The search strategy has been established in 6 databases. We will investigate the legal implications of ageism in AI by searching grey literature databases, targeted websites, and popular search engines and using an iterative search strategy. Studies meet the inclusion criteria if they are in English, peer-reviewed, available electronically in full text, and meet one of the following two additional criteria: (1) include “bias” related to AI in any application (eg, facial recognition) and (2) discuss bias related to the concept of old age or ageism. At least two reviewers will independently conduct the title, abstract, and full-text screening. Search results will be reported using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) reporting guideline. We will chart data on a structured form and conduct a thematic analysis to highlight the societal, legal, and ethical implications reported in the literature. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The database searches resulted in 7595 records when the searches were piloted in November 2021. The scoping review will be completed by December 2022. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The findings will provide interdisciplinary insights into the extent of age-related bias in AI systems. The results will contribute foundational knowledge that can encourage multisectoral cooperation to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a manner consistent with ethical values and human rights legislation as it relates to an older and aging population. We will publish the review findings in peer-reviewed journals and disseminate the key results with stakeholders via workshops and webinars. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> OSF Registries AMG5P; https://osf.io/amg5p </sec> <sec> <title>INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT</title> DERR1-10.2196/33211 </sec>
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.200 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.051 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.416 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.410 Zit.
Autoren
Institutionen
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute(CA)
- University Health Network(CA)
- University of Toronto(CA)
- Athabasca University(CA)
- Public Health Ontario(CA)
- University of Cambridge(GB)
- Leverhulme Trust(GB)
- Jewish General Hospital(CA)
- Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute(CA)
- McGill University(CA)
- Baycrest Hospital(CA)