Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Are we there yet?
1
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
<img src=” https://s3.amazonaws.com/production.scholastica/article/74009/large/chat_bot_composition_with_collage_flat_chat_bubbles_character_robot_guy_computer_vector_illustration_1284_80648.jpeg?1680011234”> This paper examines the advantages, disadvantages, opportunities, and dangers of using AI Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to write scholarly articles in natural sciences. These intelligent and impactful tools may be used for many purposes, both good and bad. There is great potential in applying these tools for science, but they have limited capabilities for now, especially in medicine-related articles. These tools should not be listed as authors or co-authors, and their sole use for overviewing the literature could eliminate citations, potentially leading to a major crisis in academic publishing.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.245 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.102 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.468 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.429 Zit.