Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Appropriateness of Recommendations Provided by ChatGPT to Interventional Radiologists
34
Zitationen
3
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the answers provided by ChatGPT to various questions in the field of interventional radiology (IR) and compare their correctness to a consensus of three interventional radiologists. Materials and Methods. Twenty questions were proposed to the online chat based ChatGPT about interventional radiology as indications for exams, complications and technical points. Answers were independently evaluated by 3 experts in interventional radiology with 10, 15 and 30 years or experiences and classified as correct, almost correct, or wrong. Results: Considering the consensus between the two IR, nine (9/20; 45%) were considered wrong, three (3/20; 15%) were considered almost correct and eight (8/20; 40%) were considered correct. Conclusion: ChatGPT can be useful in IR but the users must be aware of limitations such as too vague or inaccurate answers for the majority of questions.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.197 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.047 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.410 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.410 Zit.