Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
ChatGPT: Angel or Demond? Critical thinking is still needed
22
Zitationen
1
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
The Chatbot Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), developed by OpenAI, a type of Artificial Intelligence (AI) software designed to simulate conversations with humans, works through algorithms programmed to interpret natural language inputs, and provides appropriate pre-written or newly generated responses. The release of ChatGPT in November 2022 prompted immediate enthusiasm thanks to its multiple potential uses, but concerns were also expressed about its potential misuse, since the language model could be used to cheat on homework assignments, write essays, take examinations, and write scientific manuscripts for publication. In particular, there is heated debate amongst Journal editors, researchers, and publishers concerning the role of AI tools, such as ChatGPT, in publications. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies designed to help authors improve on the preparation and the quality of their manuscripts and published articles are, in fact, rapidly increasing in number and sophistication. These include tools to assist with writing, grammar, language, references, statistical analysis, and reporting standards. Editors and publishers also use AI-assisted tools for myriad purposes, including screening submissions for problems (e.g., plagiarism, image manipulation, ethical issues), triage submissions, validation of references, editing, and providing code content for publication in different media as well as facilitating post-publication searches and discoverability After the publication of articles that included ChatGPT as a byline author, Nature, Science, JAMA and other journals defined a new policy to guide the use of large-scale artificial intelligence models in scientific publications The policy prohibits the naming of such tools as a "credited author on a research paper" because "attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, and AI tools cannot take such responsibility" In addition, the policy also advises
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.393 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.259 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.688 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.502 Zit.