Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Use of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard to Improve Readability of ChatGPT's Answers to Common Questions About Lung Cancer and Lung Cancer Screening
70
Zitationen
5
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
ChatGPT’s responses to questions about lung cancer and LCS, although deemed clinically appropriate by cardiothoracic radiologists, were difficult to read. Simplified responses from three LLMs (ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard) had improved reading ease and readability (in terms of U.S. grade levels). However, some simplified responses were no longer clinically appropriate.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.551 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.443 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.942 Zit.
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
2019 · 6.792 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.781 Zit.