Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Human Versus Machine
0
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
This article implements a method for classifying adverse incidents involving reusable medical devices according to their underlying cause and assesses the level of agreement between different raters. To achieve this, the adverse incidents were classified into 1 or more of 62 separate categories, and the level of agreement between 3 experienced human raters was established. Moreover, the ChatGPT artificial intelligence tool was used to replicate the classification process used by human raters. The results showed that there was a fair level of agreement between human raters and a slight agreement between human raters and ChatGPT. This suggests that, although ChatGPT can intelligently classify adverse incidents, it was not able to replicate the performance of experienced human raters when given access to only the limited incident details and classification categories as provided for in this study.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.231 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.084 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.444 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.423 Zit.