Dies ist eine Übersichtsseite mit Metadaten zu dieser wissenschaftlichen Arbeit. Der vollständige Artikel ist beim Verlag verfügbar.
Using ChatGPT to navigate ambivalent and contradictory research findings on artificial intelligence
28
Zitationen
4
Autoren
2023
Jahr
Abstract
With the rapid development and integration of AI in various domains, understanding the nuances of AI research has become critical for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners. However, the results are vast and diverse and even can be contradictory or ambivalent, presenting a significant challenge for individuals seeking to grasp and synthesize the findings. This perspective paper discusses the ambivalent and contradictory research findings in the literature on artificial intelligence (AI) and explores whether ChatGPT can be used to navigate and make sense of the AI literature.
Ähnliche Arbeiten
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI
2019 · 8.214 Zit.
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
2019 · 8.071 Zit.
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
2018 · 7.429 Zit.
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
2005 · 5.776 Zit.
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
2018 · 5.418 Zit.