Comment on redefining authorship in the era of artificial intelligence: balancing ethics, transparency, and progress

Abstract

We have read the editorial titled ‘Redefining authorship in the era of artificial intelligence: balancing ethics, transparency, and progress’ by Yakup Ergun with great interest and we would like to delve deeper into the intricate balance between preserving human dignity and embracing scientific progress. We are very pleased that our editorial1Scimeca M. Bonfiglio R. Dignity of science and the use of ChatGPT as a co-author.ESMO Open. 2023; 8101607Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar has sparked a debate among researchers who, with respect and diverse perspectives, are contributing their insights to this delicate issue. The concerns raised regarding the potential impact of the use of nonhuman intelligence, such as artificial intelligence (AI) tools, as co-authors, on the dignity of researchers are indeed profound. This prompts a vital dialog on how to navigate this evolving landscape. To begin with, it is crucial to emphasize the intrinsic and non-negotiable value of human dignity. This fundamental value is not subject to negotiation or compromise, even for scientific progress, precisely because the objectives of such advancement in science should emanate from the pursuit of human goods, the first of which is the guarantee of respect for the dignity of every person. Granting authorship to nonhuman intelligences, such as ChatGPT, would essentially place it on an equal footing of dignity with a researcher, who is, first of all, a person. Historically, the norms surrounding authorship have provided a robust framework for recognizing intellectual contributions. However, in the light of the transformative impact of AI on research methodologies, we are compelled to reassess these norms. We agree with Yakup Ergun when denouncing that undeserved authors are included in the authors’ list of scientific publications. Nevertheless, in our opinion, the mistakes made by the scientific community in attributing the role of author to individuals who do not meet the criteria for authorship should not serve as a justification for employing a ‘nonperson’ as an author, even if it is a sophisticated and advanced tool. In the realm of biomedical research, where precision and ethical considerations are of paramount importance, the emergence of algo-ethics is a compelling proposition. As AI assumes a more integral role in biomedical endeavors, establishing algo-ethical guidelines becomes imperative. Algo-ethics, an intersection of algorithms and ethics, provides a framework to guide the ethical development and deployment of AI technologies, particularly in sensitive fields such as health care. Algo-ethics serves as a safeguard against the misuse or undue influence of AI in biomedicine. As AI algorithms contribute to clinical decision making, diagnostics, and treatment planning, it becomes essential to ensure that these algorithms adhere to ethical principles that preserve human dignity. Algo-ethics would involve the formulation of guidelines and standards that AI technologies must meet to guarantee patient safety, privacy, and equitable access to health care resources. In conclusion, by recognizing the intrinsic and inalienable value of the human dignity and embracing the emergence of AI in the context of biomedical research, algo-ethics can play a pivotal role in ensuring that AI technologies could truly contribute to the enhancement of human health and well-being. As we navigate the uncharted waters of AI integration, let us steadfastly uphold our commitment to advancing scientific progress while ensuring the protection of our shared human dignity. None declared.

Ähnliche Arbeiten